Get ready for a wall of text.
I understand that everyone wants the best quality, but to be honest, the market doesn’t work like that. Mass production and low cost have always won. To do some comparisons;
- why do people shop at IKEA instead of going to a carpenter or a small quality furniture store? price and a lot more products to choose from.
- why to people buy cheap cars like a Honda or Toyota instead of buying a BMW or Mercedes? price at the cost of performance.
- why do people buy cheap clothes that you have to throw away within a year instead of buying quality that can be used much longer? price and short fashion cycles making people want to buy new stuff instead of using the same clothes a second or third season.
That’s how it works today in most western countries. People want low prices and a large selection. Quality, performance etc. are the trade-offs in most cases.
When it comes to scripts no one wants crap scripts. I certainly don’t want it. But as @doublevr asked (or if it was @handyalexander), how far are consumers ready to lower their standards to get decent scripts to a lower price and/or getting a larger amount of scripts to select from? CzechVR is obviously still good enough to get recommendations here at ES despite @realcumber not scripting for them anymore. At least I haven’t read any complaints other than it takes time until new releases get a script. If scripts become too bad as a result of automated scripting then people don’t want to pay for it and spend money elsewhere. That’s how capitalism and competition works.
Another aspect is that tech often start out rather bad. Some of you are old enough to remember early voice recognition like when you called a customer care center on the phone or used it in your car? People made fun of how bad the early attempts were, especially when it came to recognize different accents. Today you have excellent voice recognition in speakers, phones, TVs and so on and very few are complaining because the tech evolved.
Scripting is a small market with little to no venture capital (I assume) and only indirect research in AI/image recognition (I highly doubt that any university has explicitly funded image recognition of dicks, breasts etc to facilitate scripting
). So initiatives from SLR/@doublevr and TheHandy/@handyalexander should be encouraged as long as they don’t become anti-consumer trying to create closed ecosystems and other bad things as a result of it.
So be positive about technology advancement. Hopefully scripting using AI will be good enough given time. Personally I believe that the first step is just automating the bulk of the scripting and then humans will fix the tricky parts. Who knows, at some point in the future AI scripting might become SaaS (Software as a Service) where you pay the price of a script today to get a custom video scripted using AI with good results. No need to choose from a catalog anymore. (we can always dream
)
Finally, regarding the risk of setting a low standard for scripts due to automated scripting as it is now;
Money talks. Don’t use services that produce bad scripts. We can all help raising awareness of better alternatives. When some one asks for a movie to watch on Netflix you don’t answer that “this movie is crap, don’t watch that”, you anser “this movie is good”. Do the same with studios and scripts.
Don’t focus on the bad, focus on the good.