By this standard, I’m not the one being dogmatic. I have repeatedly insisted everyone to read the other threads where I explain the reasoning and included it here in this thread. YOU are the one rejecting evidence, and being equally dogmatic in the other respects.
That is not what dogma is. Being well-informed is why I have better insight to why my opinion is more valuable than most. This is why doctors exist. This is why the justice system brings in professionals as witnesses to testimony.
You’re right. Vote with your wallet.
You misunderstand my answers, I have directly addressed this. MFA covers many threatmodels, not the just the primary one that is the reasoning behind the decision. I have admitted to my fallibility that it was irresponsible to not have enforced this sooner.
The tradeoff is being miscalculated by the vocal opposition. They don’t understand the full threatmodel because they’re either ill-informed or ignoring what I have already stated.
There’s are a few dozen users who have been vocal about not liking MFA.
There’s another couple dozen who have been vocal about liking MFA, though unfortunately most of them only DM’d me.
The vast majority of users don’t care either way.
Your privacy is not my responsibility. The only privacy of yours that IS my responsibility is information you provide to the forum. I’m not asking you for your identification. I’m not asking you for billing information. I’m not asking you to subscribe to a newsletter. I’m not asking you for a picture of your face.
The only PPI I have on you is an email address, which by your own admission is a throwaway. You can keep your throwaway. I’m not asking you to abandon it. I’m asking you to enroll a shared secret, an any authenticator. Whether it’s a chrome extension, an app on your phone, a desktop app, a usb key, I don’t care. This is an easy frictionless security issue. You just don’t want to put in the effort.
I have made multiple posts and guides on how to do this privately. Claiming privacy as an argument is rejecting evidence.
This is continuing to reject evidence.
This is continuing to reject evidence.
This is not possible in discourse. I have said this already.
This is continuing to reject evidence.
This is continuing to reject evidence.
This is continuing to reject evidence.
I could go on, but I would be here for hours compiling every instance of a concern I have already answered for.
You can’t call me dogmatic when you are yourself being dogmatic.
I’m EXHAUSTED of being nice to people attacking my character because they’re ignorant and lazy.
Grow the fuck up.