Just downloaded FunGen and I’m having some trouble with the AI generations. For my very first script that I generated, Fungen performed pretty well and had even given chapters for certain parts of the video however after trying a new video, the AI generation turned to shit and had huge chunks where it just wasn’t scripted. Not sure if it was something I accidentally tweaked in the settings as I was playing around trying to refine the first AI script.
Below is an example of the same video I generated for the first time and then after it went to shit. I believe I had used 2D Non-Pov for both scripts. Thanks for any help i can get
Same video:
First AI Script Generation Heatmap
Second AI Script Generation Heatmap
Second script also has much finer details with a lot of points
The first one looks like Hybrid Flow, and the second one looks like 2D non-Pov.
I assume you’re using FunGen Free. The trackers available there are carried over from the old FunGen 1.0, and neither of them is particularly good for 2D videos. If you have a specific video, I can help generate it with the Pro version so you can see the difference.
The question was why the AI generation was good the first time but bad the second, and if there’s something the user can do to improve the script generation with this model.
(Personally I don’t use script generators and can’t give advice on this.)
I have also had this issue. Not necessarily the “turned to shait” portion, but huge chunks unscripted. I ended up manually deleting the sub folders in the cache folder located in → \FunGen\fungen-data\cache. Just to give it a clean start, and rebuild the video from scratch. I will not claim that this fixes the problem, perhaps I just got lucky.
In the settings menu you will find MODELS might be some settings there to tinker with. But not an expert on FunGen, as I mostly use OFS. But yeah I see the potential.
The inconsistent AI generation could be due to differences in video complexity or scene changes. HaptiQ’s computer vision-based funscript generator handles varied video types consistently by analyzing motion patterns frame by frame. If you’re looking for more reliable results, it might be worth trying HaptiQ’s free tier to see if it performs better for your needs.
