I only sell products. This is something I thought about from the very beginning. I believe that users who assemble their own devices (those who enjoy DIY) and those who simply use the products have different user profiles (though there may be some overlap). I will focus on doing one thing well first, before moving on to others.
3 Likes
Like the OSR2, SR6, and FUNSR1, it is also a device based on T-CODE, so the connection method is the same.
1 Like
Lets us know your findings soldier.
I am very interested in this device - in its current form factor too.
1 Like
Latest updates:
• Users can adjust the maximum speed.
• Users can adjust the maximum travel distance, up to 23 cm.
7 Likes
Im interested in buying. I currently have an autoblow ai but want a multi-axis so just want to ask some questions.
If I wanted to use a third party sleeve that is not a fleshlight, would you recommend the twist or the open receiver?
Does the twist require a fleshlight? The comments above state the twist comes with an onahole adapter so im assuming that works with the twist but want to double check. Are there screenshots of the ona adapter?
1 Like
the open receiver looks like a similar way you strap, things on with the funsr
it has slots where you can use a strap, so you can wrap it around the open receiver, its wide so when its pivots, your sensitive parts wont hit the hard plastic.
and for the twist, only a flashlight, or a flashlight clone will work with it well. its designed to clamp with the plastic on the hard case of the fleshlight.
so i believe the open receiver is what you want for a non fleshlight sleeve.
i have used the adapter, but i havent gotten a good experience with it yet. its does work tho. have to tighten it alot to keep the sleeve in place. personally i find the twist as janky, so i havent used it much. 4-6 times in the past year.
1 Like
this is the issue i have with the SR1 2.0. the onahole i have is thinner than this one, and it doesnt get very good contact to the adapter, usually ends up slipping out of the adapter, best solution ive found to this is to loosen the screws a little bit and tilt the “prongs” inwards slightly, its not a great solution and still slips sometimes, but better than no grip at all.
4 Likes
I am really looking forward to holding the device in my hands. If I understand correctly, all orders placed in October will include the Vesa mount, right?
1 Like
is the twist module the Pro comes with the same as the FunSR1v2? I have that one already.
They all use stepper motors, and the internal structure is the same. However, due to the different shapes of the main devices, their external appearances differ and cannot be used interchangeably.
How much does this thing weigh please?
Around 1.8KG
How do people use a device like this?
Is it usually with a PCVR?
This is not for Q3 DeoVR streaming setup?
Thanks
Looks awesome. I would just be worried about replacement parts, how much do those motors cost? Its easy with OSR2 because servos are only 15 euros or so.
AI said $110-$180 retail, so you can’t really get one (as I suppose it’s highly customized), or it’ll be sold there for like $150.
So you have to hope it won’t break, and OP will have to test it thoroughly to make sure they cannot break by design (e.g., if they stop against a wall) - unless they are defective - and have a warranty for them if you don’t go over some limits (which you shouldn’t really be able to go over for your regular <1.5kg toy)
But to know when one breaks, OP has to break one, but they are very expensive…
It may cost around 90-100 US dollars. The joint motor has almost no drawbacks except being expensive.
It rarely breaks under normal circumstances. What I can offer is a 6-month free warranty.
2 Likes
Feels abit like The Titanic ‘The Unsinkable Ship!’ to me, but I suppose we will see! I imagine if you stall the motor with force it’ll burn out just like any other motor.
I can’t speak to this specific motor model, but have you seen industrial robot arms or bionic robots like the Boston Dynamics dog robots?
There are industrial applications that use this type of motor (in different dimensions) and need to have long durability and cycle resistance. Because a broken down robot can decrease production output significantly, a lot of emphasis is placed on reliability and durability. Some of them also use brush-less DC joint motors for those robot arms, albeit in completely different dimensions.
Many humanoid and other bionic robots use the same type of motor and may be closer to this dimension, but I don’t know how durable these are.
So the concept of using these motors isn’t the problem. It’s the system integration, as well as the specific make, that would make a difference, and especially the latter can’t be judged without trying unfortunately.
Usually a well designed motor controller would de-rate the current to avoid damage. That’s another parameter maybe FunOSR can talk a bit about.
1 Like