Not a lot of changes have been made. Just the naming of the tag muted groups and required tagging. You can review that here: Required Tagging
Feel free to comment on these changes under this thread.
Thanks, don’t forget to donate! Thanks!
It sounds like ai tags apply to ai generated scripts, while all other apply to the video content?
I think that distinction is not clear, if it is implied.
ai generated/assisted is for scripts
Possibly odd question. If it is AI generated and human rescripted from steam to stern then I would assume that would still count as human scripted since your just using AI to make the base scripting more efficient with frame by frame review and modification to clean all details for accuracy. Correct?
I would consider that AI-assisted:
The justification in your example where a human modifies 100% of the points, the AI still influenced the frames that have points and number of points (ie: velocity/range)
Your site, your rules — of course. I just wanted to share a different perspective.
I don’t fully agree with the way AI-assisted scripting is being described. When AI generates a base template but I still go through frame-by-frame making full manual adjustments, it doesn’t feel accurate to call the final result “AI-generated.” For example, if a script has around 2,500 points and the AI produces 1,000 of them, I still end up modifying each of those AI-created points to correct timing, stroke length, and overall accuracy. By the time the script is finished, none of the points remain in their original AI form.
This is why labeling something as “AI-assisted” can give a false impression of the scripter’s actual skill or the amount of work invested. It can make it seem as if the AI handled a significant portion of the precision, when in reality the scripter still has to rewrite or refine every point to maintain quality. In practice, “assisted” often just means the person was able to work faster — not that the result is any less hand-crafted. The final quality is still dependent on frame-by-frame adjustments, assuming the creator takes pride in their craft.
From my experience, AI can get you close, but it still can’t match human-level accuracy. Substantial correction is always required, and the end product is still fully hand-scripted.
All that said, it’s your platform, and I respect and will follow your rules. I simply wanted to offer some thoughtful context on why the definition of “AI-assisted” may not apply equally to everyone’s workflow.
Using AI to speed up your process still assists you.
You’re free to explain in your post how you use AI, but whether you think so or not the AI is influencing your decisions.
For ex. In many scripts where an action is hard to simulate creators will get creative and make your stroker do something that isn’t accurate but helps increase how immersive the script is. One that comes to mind is when a vibrator is being used, increasing the velocity with lots of small changes and frequent points can simulate a vibrator.
An AI will not do this for you, and you may decide as a result to either not simulate it or use AIs points as a starting point for your own decision making.
This isn’t the only example of how an AI can influence how you might simulate things. Funscript is more art than just plotting points, and if you use AI to assist you that should be disclosed.
I appreciate you taking the time to explain your viewpoint. And I can see where you are coming from on that. I will agree to disagree on your philosophy on that as mine differs quite a bit. However I can appreciate your varied stance on AI assisted vs human made.
It is an interesting intellectual debate that is for sure. 
This is in part too strict (or not enough descriptive) because it makes all “Point Tracking” “ai-assisted” which doesn’t make sense IMO
Mods are discussing the future of the tag and it’s usage requirements