Gonna try and not sound like a mad scientist here but I’ve been thinking about using different sensors alongside videos to detect when the user is about to climax and either stop/slowdown to edge or (other side of it) trigger an end scene.
Initially I thought about an EEG machine to monitor brain activity (this is the mad scientist part of the post lol) but idk about you, I don’t have north of a thousand pound to spend on one of those. So my second thought was a heart rate monitor, much more cheaper and accessible.
Now that we can record data we can potentially feed the live data into an AI and detect patterns leading up to climax. Could skip the AI part and just have a limit that when its reached is triggered.
Lastly this could be used to detect what parts excite the user the most, this data could be used with an AI again to corelate what’s on screen to the heartrate level.
I might try experimenting with this myself if I can find the parts cheap enough.
Sounds great. I remember there has been some prior research done, documented here:
A simple heart rate limit to decide the closeness was deemed too slow/inaccurate. However, adding AI into the equation might be what it takes to achieve a breakthrough in that regard. If AI is good at anything, it’s pattern recognition, predicting if a value is about to go somewhere (rather than relying on a fixed threshold), based on previous measurements/observations, tailored to the user. Also including the reference to what’s on screen sounds very interesting.
Definitely following this thread
Yeah I’m guessing that there would have to be database of previous heartrates in sessions. Based on the issues raised in that post, maybe the model could base its predictions on the current heart rate rather then all previous data to fit slower and faster sessions. Another thing to take into account is the quality of the sensor, for now I’ve just gotten some cheap one but if it works I might get another.
I’ve ordered some heartrate sensor and will update when they arrive.
It’s a neat concept, but it seems like the main obstacle is solving which elements of “excitement” are actually observable by technology. @Ratattack15 brought this idea up when mentioning the nogasm (a buttplug designed to detect arousal).
Once that problem is solved, I can definitely see how AI might use that info to feed users certain content or control a device based on a desired outcome.
Note that the nogasm doesnt realy measure excitement, it only measures muscles related to orgasms. These usualy apply more preasure when getting close. But as user you can force these, and the pressure applied varies depending on arousal.
In most nogasm sessions you must often first set it to react early, and then scale it after a few times towards the level you normaly would use. Otherwise you might get a very quick ruined orgasm.
But once configured well, you can be kept close to orgasm for an hour (and what a torture that is!). And even then, its no guarantee, your responses vary.
And this is where AI can help though. Which especialy as more devices are connected allows it to use a more wide pattern and get a better estimate. The nogasm here is just another sensor, but a very reliable one.
I have been @'ed and thus I am here now. Although I was mainly passing on information scattered around the place and using Nogasm as the main example since it was the simplest and no BS way it seems to have an setup if you got cash.
Also @jaywalker and @lsidfoaprgsmdvlnvas both did testing about how to do various methods and so are best to await for them to weigh in on thoughts to further develop this all as said already. (Especially as they might have also done more testing/investigating that they haven’t talked about yet)
My personal thoughts haven’t changed really from my previous one from that thread except that doing something based off heart rate alone is near impossible. Thinking about it now with brain monitoring and AI to decipher the brain sounds extremely shakey since there’s been years of research already on-going into various brain reading techs and nothing has come out yet that is exactly consumer use-able and cost effective as said.
However I’ve also done some looking into prostate stimulation side of stuff and found that this area makes me personally believe the Nogasm even less use-able I believe now. (Please note I have not tried an Nogasm) Since well if your butt is less trained then it’ll be harder to deal with the Nogasm’s buttplug (air-plug?) essentially…also your muscles are weaker alongside you being less…uhh aware lets say of what’s going on. (which is an double edged sword lets say) But if your experience or your butt is trained then Nogasm would work better since well your more used to the space it needs and the feeling it gives however (this is the double edged sword bit) you might gain stimulation from it or due to your training you might need an bigger buttplug size (more air in it) that it then puts pressure on your prostate.
If you didn’t know…inflatable buttplugs can make it so you experience prostate pleasure extremely easily but are extremely annoying in terms of getting an actual decent one that is possible to sit on during use, connect to something else to pump it and also have the insert-able end inflate all round evenly or fit back onto the soft head evenly…as a lot have inflation lean to one side more than the other. (Your inside muscles don’t help with that though)
I think though from some thinking about E-stim stuff is maybe one way you can tell that an orgasm is coming and maybe detect it is via getting some way to read muscle contractions of the bulbospongiosus muscle (BC for short) as that pushes the sperm out which as a result is usually the trigger for the refractory period to start. (in very simple terms as it’s actually other hidden stuff that causes it but the ejection of sperm is main visual trigger) It can be difficult though to get an E-stim pad on to it if you have some loose skin or your balls aren’t already scrunched up (or scrunch themselves) and that’s also not taking into account hair possibly getting in the way which you never want to shave that area down fully (if you can manage to even) if you know about needle hair you get when it starts to grow back.
PS just incase anyone gets interested in prostate orgasm stuff…have an condom version of an catheter on since it can be easy to have an wet and messy accident. (Since it can make you feel the urge to pee or even do so as part of an prostate orgasm)
@G420000 That’s Nogasm “version 2” though it’s got problems with it when I looked into it as it is also mainly made to be an more consumer friendly version of the Nogasm since that was various parts put together. (As it’s open source and you can build it at home yourself for much cheaper)
As a result it still has the same problems with monitoring excitement/orgasm levels.
I did think that calculations could be made on the data during getting the readings. Potentially an FFT to condense the readings so that if there’s certain amount of readings over a determined value then its more likely that the user is climaxing. Maybe other calculations would be more fitting.
I know the EEG method is far less appealing as its far more expensive, but it could be used with the heart rate monitor (and even the nogasm) to get more readings but at this point its kinda feeling like neo in the pod in the matrix.
Does feel like I’m late to the party on this topic but I will still do my own research. I am interested in everyones own experiences on this though.
