For those who've used both FunGen 2 and FunScriptFlow: Which one actually makes better scripts?

Help
, , ,
1

I’ve been comparing FunGen 2 and FunScriptFlow to generate scripts for my The Handy, but I still can’t decide which one is better.

I know that manual scripting will always produce the best results, but I just don’t have enough free time to script everything myself. That’s why I’ve been trying these AI-assisted tools.

I mainly use The Handy with videos that I’ve downloaded, so having a good automatic workflow is really important to me.

I’ve tested both tools, but since I’m still pretty new to scripting, I don’t have enough experience to confidently say which one produces better results overall.

I’d love to hear from people who have been doing this for a while:

  • Which one do you prefer and why?

  • Which tool gives you the best scripts with the least amount of manual editing?

  • Do you have any settings or workflow recommendations to get the best results?

I’d really appreciate hearing your experiences before I commit to using one of them as my main workflow. Thanks!

2

Fungen2 by a mile. It mostly just works these days, not too much to tweak I think.

3

Only problem is the cost

4

Is it in the free version too, or just the paid one?

5

FunGen2 with the VR Pro model is pretty decent, it does need some work after generation but it handles most of it pretty well. You do need to remove false contacts and add missing ones but the vast majority is there and the added “Doctor” really helps with frame-timing fixes and identifying areas that need work. Funscript Flow really is just using motion oscillation to build a script, FunGen2 still uses that to an extent but it tends to focus more on the correct areas, not necessarily always correct though as ghost movements can still occur. I think FunGen1 required penis detection to work correctly at all but FunGen2 is still able to get decent results when there technically isn’t one (i.e. lesbian scenes, solo, even trans works to a degree)