Reminder how popular teen content is on pornhub, it’s basically #1 or #2, and remember why pornhub became verified only.
I speak up because I want those who confuse Loli and Shota with CP to have a correct perception based on facts.
If you simply don’t like it, that’s fine. But you should stop attacking people with theories that do not fit the facts.
First of all, what do you think is the reason for the low rate of sex crimes in Japan, a country with a high rate of pornography?
And why do you think the crime rate of CP in Japan is so much lower than in countries that ban them, even though most of the Loli and Shota content comes from Japan?
It is because pornography that is considered immoral, not only loli and shota content, is a “fantasy work” that is “creative” and has nothing to do with reality.
I will say it again. The crime rate of CP in Japan is much lower than in countries where Lolita and Shota are banned.
It is nonsense to link Loli and Shota to actual CP crimes.
I think it would be more convincing if those who deny Loli and Shota would first raise the issue with evidence.
What is the problem and what are the actual bad effects in reality?
It may affect some psychopaths, but there is no end to such things, and if that is the case, we need to regulate everything immoral in the world.
School shootings are a good example. Why not regulate violent games and guns? It is because the games and guns themselves are innocent.
This is the funniest shit ever.
To quote:
Only 5–10 percent of rape victims report it to police, and police record half or less of reported cases while prosecutors charge about one-third of recorded cases. The result of this process of caseload attrition is that for every 1,000 rapes in Japan, only 10–20 result in a criminal conviction – and fewer than half of convicted rapists are incarcerated.
It’s a thing with Japan, see their stupid conviction rate which they are proud of.
This is honestly the correct way to look at things.
It’s a sad world we live in that so many people cannot understand that they can simply ignore something they dislike and not personally engage with it. No instead it must be purged for everyone else for them to feel comfortable.
We all know what happens when you purge because you don’t like it. Literally 1940’s.
Wow! You did your research well! As you pointed out, the reporting rate in Japan is low. However, even if the reporting rate were to reach 25%, the same as in the U.S., the incidence rate would still remain low.
And sadly, there is still room for improvement in the Japanese justice system. This is not only related to sex crimes, but also to the judicial background in which 99.9% of people are convicted once they are prosecuted.
What you are talking about is the conviction rate in trials, which is a different issue from the incidence rate.
Sure lol.
I dunno, according to a survey about 7% of women in Japan have experienced forced sexual intercourse (compared to 25% in the US).
You can question the methodology and perceptions behind survey data, but we should go by the best available studies rather than guessing how bad it really is.
Lack of reporting is definitely an issue with sexual abuse. Rape is under-reported pretty much everywhere, altho it does seem to be worse in Japan than average. About 90% of rape goes unreported in Japan, compared to 80% in Sweden and 60% in the US.
By getting a representative sample population to answer a survey about their reported and unreported experiences.
Hi! Let’s look at the actual number of reported cases in 2022!
The number of reported cases of child sexual abuse in Japan in 2022 is 2,197.
Calculating this number against Japan’s population (approximately 125.7 million people), the number is approximately 1.75 cases per 100,000 people.
In the United States, there were approximately 380,494 cases of child sexual abuse reported in 2022.
Calculating this figure for the U.S. population (about 332 million people), we arrive at about 114.5 cases per 100,000 people.
You get the idea.
It may be true that Japan is under-reporting, but the argument of under-reporting is not convincing because there is too much difference in the number of reports.
Pornhub took the shitty easy way out and just wiped everything that wasn’t verified, probably 99% of which wasn’t illegal at all. They just couldn’t be fucked combing through and finding the offending videos
Any site that big can just go “we make too much money to care”.
I’m glad that HMV Mania, iwara, and PMVHaven are at least three main alternatives for people who don’t want to risk their privacy just to post HMVs. rule34video and some others are more stringent on what’s allowed.
Roads have speed limits and traffic enforcement because some people can’t drive responsibly without them. Drugs are not illegal because some people would abuse them. Guns are tightly regulated (at least in some countries) because some people might kill many others with them. You’ll have to step through a metal detector and submit your luggage to search because some people might blow up airplanes if you dont.
Shall I go on?
I’ll probably get banned for asking this but what loli porn should I download now?
https://discuss.eroscripts.com/t/loli-shota-mega-archive/175884
https://discuss.eroscripts.com/t/alternative-sharing-sites-for-loli-shota-content/173208/57
not in fiction
not in fiction
not in fiction
not in fiction
Shall I go on?
Hey if you’re making an argument about child porn, I agree, it is illegal for a very good reason, there is a clear victim in the production of cp, and the consumption of cp promotes its production.
But tell me, who is the victim in a drawing or animation?
Loli hentai is made by adults, for adults. There is simply no evidence to suggest that it promotes or encourages real child porn.
I agree with putting restrictions on certain actions/activities/products if the abuse of those freedoms means putting other people at risk.
But putting restrictions on fictional media does not protect anyone
I responded to your question. You completely sidetracked it into whether it was fiction or not.
I don’t agree that there are no ill effects. Research is not nearly as one-sided as you make it out to be.
Free-speech absolutionists tend to make unserious and histrionic claims, as evidenced in this thread.
The decision has already been made. What is even the point of this discussion anymore, except to whine and complain?
I mean, you’re still here too buddy, nobody is forcing you to respond

