Upcoming loli/shota ban and timeline

Sorry i’m not brain damaged enough to relate loli and children.

Edit: this is my reply to vlad and my last one on this thread.

Loli’s are not children. The fact you think so already worries me about why the tag is being scrubbed away. Loli is simply a character archetype in anime/manga. It has no relation to real life and there’s no such thing as IRL loli or anything like that. If the problem is how they look then you’ll be banning all the content with petite women or anything from the “barely legal” category that is oh so popular on porn sites.

even if that is a loli it’s a legal one. but just looks like a petite character it being in a sfm type style also leads credence to that

So you think loli aren’t children?
You’re either confused are tried a failed gotcha.
I’m feeling merciful. Try not to get banned.

Edit: I wasn’t trying to imply loli are children. I was pointing out the contradiction Aodin was making.

1 Like

Lolis are cartoons. Children are people. Do you think live action porn with girls who look younger than 18 should also be banned? What about roleplay scenes where the girl not only looks super young, but is pretending/implied to be underage? Of course we don’t care about that, because we know it isn’t real. Cartoon porn is exponentially less real than live action, and yet people act like it is somehow more harmful

2 Likes

I’ll be honest here. I have a different view when it comes to shota stuff than I do loli stuff. The loli stuff for me is as if I was the adult man having sex with underage girls, and that does not sit well with me, regardless if it’s just a cartoon. With shota however, I do not see it as me in the role of an underaged boy having sex with adult women. Instead, I see it as if I’m still an adult man, but having sex with larger/taller/thicker adult women who initiate it. Like the Amazon women in Futurama.

Hidden

I’m scaroused!

not all of them are.

as much as i think the guy is an idiot, its not very classy of you to threaten to ban someone while continuing a conversation that isn’t supposed to be on this post anymore too.

You’re a mod why don’t you act like it?
you both should continue this conversation here regardless of how you feel about it.

3 Likes

He’s got a fair point, actually.

Yes. That VaM character can be considered loli in the broad sense. Even the video had “loli” in its title. However, I shall reiterate that the criteria for the loli tag on this site is depictions that looks pre-pubescent. She’s got small tits indeed, but that’s not a pre-pubescent body.

Absolutely. Loli is not children. Loli is a depiction.

image

4 Likes

what’s VaM mean?

Virt-a-mate it’s a program here: https://hub.virtamate.com/

1 Like

VaM is awesome, there’s mods to use it with the handy in realtime

There’s also a lot of loli mods for it :sob:

3 Likes

4 posts were merged into an existing topic: Loli / shota debate containment thread

Folk crying “1984!” over the prospect of not having free access to borderline paedo-porn, is both concerning and hilarious.

While we’re at it - could we get an option to filter out animated stuff in general? This platform is being flooded with it since this announcement. I’m sure I’m not in the minority when I say it’s irritating AF to have to scroll through it all

You can mute tags. You can also scroll through topics by searching by tags/keywords/categories you want to see and excluding tags you don’t want to see by typing “-tags:animation,hentai,cgi”.

Doesn’t seem to work for me

If I type “-tags:animation,hentai,cgi” into the search bar, it specifically shows only those things.

If I type it into the tags filter, it says “no results found”

Really? You get topics with those tags on this page?
https://discuss.eroscripts.com/search?q=-tags%3Aanimation%2Chentai%2Ccgi

Yeah, first one is hentai… plus it’s a mixture of all categories, free, paid, requests, software etc.

Normally I’d just click on Free Scripts and scroll through, for example. But it’d be nice if it was possible to exclude a few tags from that list, instead of just specify one to include

You can further specify a category. But you’re saying the first result has the tag hentai if you click the link I posted?

Ah, the ones that are showing don’t have any tags at all, that’ll be why.

However, that solution is showing everything in all categories… it’s somewhat worse than not doing it at all. Thank you though

https://discuss.eroscripts.com/search?q=-tags%3Aanimation%2Chentai%2Ccgi%20%23scripts%3Afree-scripts

I feel like an internet mom teaching a kid about how to click buttons on a website… Or maybe a grandchild realizing the older generations don’t know about modern technology…

This link includes the category specification.
Because I clicked on the button to choose category.
You can click other buttons too, like sorting by most likes or relevance.
You can add tags or keywords you want to include too.

You’re not clicking buttons though are you? you’re typing a syntax that would be otherwise unknown to most people.

So, lets drop the condescension, shall we.

Thank you for your input, it’s no longer required.