There is now a list of artists and their publishing requirements.
Whenever you are going to publish content from another artist ensure you have checked this list.
If there is no entry it’s a good idea to look if there are any and report it so we can keep this list up to date.
Publishing requirements:
- There are some publishing requirements from artists, that must be followed.
- Please report changes and missing entries to keep this list up to date
What happens if in the future the rules as a result prohibit publishing scripts made for content that that while made by said artists doesn’t have a version that fits their rules?
e.g Watermarked video is 5 minutes long but the full length video version is not watermarked.
Are we then banned from making a script and sharing it on that video version?
Also what about cases where the video quality is the only difference or clothing specific video versions? Is it okay to upscale a video then so it’s basically the same as the 4k video with the watermark?
I’m wondering of well…how restrictive could these conditions get or is there a limit already in mind? (e.g. there will never be an restriction that makes it so an script can’t be published due to the video breaking the restrictions)
Finally I’m curious as to what’s brought on this change I thought that usually content shared is named or credit is given to the creators like providing an link to the funscript or preview images? Most try to do it but there’s cases where the creator can’t be found.
I hope I’m not being pedantic with asking before anything happened yet but I’d rather ask these questions at the start before things get sticky rather than after they are like tar sticky.
Please correct me if I’m wrong, but I think the publishing rule is specifically for content created and owned by the artist - you would still be able to post a script for the full video, but you wouldn’t be allowed to share the video itself since it doesn’t fit the publishing rules. I see it as a weaker version of no-free-links.
If it is then (oosp I misunderstood :s ) but also the wording has not made this clear to me and so I would like this to be reworded to be more clear as while it’s concise it’s very technical.
As it also doesn’t make it clear if it’s just in relation to providing the full video or extends beyond that to posting previews to it. Since some scripters have done with posting cut up gifs or the first minute or two of the video with the ghost stroker moving alongside.
I would hope that it doesn’t extend to that but if it does then I still have my same concerns on top of still the question of “how restrictive can it get”.
The intention is to respects artists publishing standards for their media.
This has nothing to do with previews, scripts, or anything else that is standard.
I can flesh out the wording to make it more clear.