There was another forum but it died because the owner/runner/moderator left. In regards to getting community input. There has been lots of input please see earlier discussions or flamewars about this subject.
I do agree that if there was another place for people to go to it might not hurt as much if your particular niche gets banned.
Only solution is make your own script forum but with Blackjack and Loli’s.
This is one action that should never be taken no matter the circumstance, they can instant nuke the whole site and that would be it.
Lmao that is wild, imagine going to jail over a “what is art?” opinion and feeling. This test is so archaic and confusing.
Couldn’t they also hit you for obscenity if you had furry or guro or any other “eye hurting” content?
How the hell does Fakku even exist on US soil and why is the content so widely available if a single image of unknown age hentai schoolgirls in your cache can land you in trouble and the 2nd Circle of Hell?
It now feels like if you type in hentai in google and look at the first few websites you’ve committed a felony, also better watch out for those hentai ads. Who knew that adblockers would literally be saving lives.
Ideally that’s what I’m trying to do in the other general thread. More sites hosting and generally being aware of the existence of funscripts is a good thing for everyone. But using an established site with an active userbase is the goal. If no site fits and there’s no other option, I probably will host it myself, its just the last resort.
Was on the patreon for a long time, still on the patron of many creators, also a very active buyer of scripts. I don’t make scripts because I’ve got my hands full with other hobbies (doujin scanlations)
I’m not trying to argue in bad faith, I’m just too riled up over the same old story happening to another damn site. The seriously awful lack of real info in the initial post doesnt help.
I really don’t think there’s reason to worry about legal action and that HC is being overly cautious to the detriment of a big part of the user base. The protect act and the miller test are super fringe and have rarely ever been used, and using them to justify a ban feels like working backwards. Starting from “we want to ban this thing” and finding legal reasons that fit
Mega has always been an gamble of “how long till I’m banned” game if your sharing files on it that are anything adult rated or copyrighted ever since the mass internet file sharing spree back when mediafire and it were great and go to’s for using. It’s why I straight up decided to only use mega to host files for myself and use any other site that doesn’t require an account (and without IP banning and email signup) or have a long history of being an adult hosting file site.
Just a risk I decided I wouldn’t take since it was an certain thing to happen and there was plenty of alternatives before swearing off doing any file sharing of my own. (which is a bad last resort in my mind)
I think we’re slightly in the green right now?
(edited my deleted post above)
Exactly it has always been a wack-a-mole game for the filehost since forever, and 99.9% of the time they don’t take actions automatically. It’s basically always someone reporting it which either removes the link, or with enough of these actions they take down the whole account. I’m sure at least 50% of the uploads on this site would get taken down for filehost TOS.
Using “the recent news of hosting sites taking down a bunch of user content.” as a reason/defense doesn’t really work because this has always been an issue.
But at the end of the day it is hugecat’s decision, but the users will always have their own thing to say about it, considering the costs are mostly? funded by users. At least we were told and given time before the action hit which i’m sure most users can appreciate.
if you’re gonna ban Loli/shota. while you at it, also ban rape and non concentual sex would yah. i would make lots of people happy i bet.
Technically that is already taken care of by the ES ToS:
https://discuss.eroscripts.com/tos#heading--content-standards
We do. If the scene is not CnC and legitimate rape. its not allowed. Girldoporn studio is not allowed as a result. if a simulated scene does not state its CnC or theres no sourceindicating that its banned. report anything you see like that.
Another question about the ban is what about simply talking about/requesting loli scripts. Are we going to be allowed to link people to other sites that allow them? Would this affect patreon links of creators that are still gonna script them?
First time I’ve ever wanted a down vote button.
the mod like politics
please understand
(Sorry for my English but here’s my take on it)
A smart decision regarding the law or lawsuits.
However, the argument can be made that those creepy loli enjoyers were kept back from doing the real deal. The idea of such a law would be to keep people from doing it yet the irony presents itself that without a way to express this it will ultimately boil over.
Ofcourse that same argument can be flipped, it only feeds their inner need for such content or interaction to people who seek these preferences.
Ultimately deep down these people know that putting such an emphesis on their young appearance is what drives the need for viewing it. And i would advise serious help to them. Ironic as iam a very degenerate person who loves dirty porn.
But this is not porn or anything regarding pleasure. This is a true gateway unlike those drug arguments you see about marihuana. Nobody acidentally goes towards sex, not in the way these people defend it. Everyone knows what sex is, what a child is and what society thinks about such acts.
Besides that its better for the site in general as i think even when done perfectly in accordance to law it will push people away.
There is not a single study that would prove this, in fact there is only evidence against the fact.
Uuuh 
plenty of hentai or animations where consent is clearly only one way on here… (also animals cannot consent if we take it to this extreme)
I COULD point to some but they are really good femdom content and I’m no snitch.
so… to ME (and I want this to be clear) that sounds like hot air and maybe someone trying to cover their ass.
…
See, that’s one thing that bothers me about this whole thing, this whole discussion. From beginning to end there’s been no transparency and FEELS like (I’m not saying it is) someone trying to come up with excuses one after the other.
Animated people/animals are not real.
in case it was missed earlier:
Our stance is effectively like so:
If the law permits, and no one is hurt, its no one else’s business.
Consider me confused all over again then.
Genuinely.
The content that’s getting banned is not Lala Kudo getting railed in a preschooler uniform (which, once again, with the example I’ve linked earlier, seems to definitely fit the “obscene” mark to me)
It’s animated stuff, right? AKA not real people/animals?
Well, whatever, it’s your decision, of course.
But as a contributor to the Patreon, as someone who scripted free scripts and try to help as I can around the forum and be a generally nice fellow… (this thread excepted)
I’m just trying to wrap my head around a decision that makes little sense to me.
Sorry if you feel like I’m badgering you, it’s not my intention. I like to understand what’s happening especially if I contribute to the community in question in various ways.
Thanks. Someone had to say it.
And once again… Lala Kudo is MUCH closer than Grim Aloe (I can’t fucking believe they’re gonna nuke the already criminally low amount of content with Grim Aloe in it) to being “indistinguishable”
Nakk, getting close.
CustomUdon is dangerously close, I’ll admit.
Hence my confusion.