@Zalunda For example, this post is effectively useless from a historical perspective because nobody would be able to find it. Having edit history does not matter.
@mADsCRIPTS I can’t optmize my scripts list, because 1 post has not enough chars for a nice list with all my scripts. So i have to make comments, comments are not editable.
Yeah definitely not ideal due to technical restrictions. If I had to suggest a workaround, it would now be best as multiple topics each as their own wiki. I could imagine a similar naming scheme and perhaps a parent topic that collects them all into 1 location.
@tastyseekin I don’t love it either, but I do feel like we’re between a rock and a hard place. We’ve previously allowed small scale deletions. But I think this is the 2nd or 3rd time we’re dealing with such a large scale deletion request with thousands of old posts affected from both the specific user and everyone they’re interacting with.
@Zalunda @Falafel honestly I think that editing very old topics to add updates might not be the best option for exposure anyway. I don’t have exact stats but I’d assume that old posts get only a tiny fraction of new views compared to new ones. If you’ve added something sufficiently new like multi-axis scripts, that sounds like it deserves a new topic, which would get way more views. This doesn’t address every case like minor edits or broken links, but I have a hunch that replies are probably sufficient tbh.
Also very unfortunate timing, but I will soon be out of the country for about 2 weeks. May need other @moderators to help pick up the slack on this thread in the meantime.