I also wish there was an official feedback system in place. Personally, I love the depth of the Definitive Poll, but it wouldn’t need to be so detailed. It would be great if users would specify the device used, script feedback (intensity, detail, accuracy, ect), and other indicators (this made me cum, permanent keeper, finisher script, can’t make it all the way through despite trying, ect)
Note to @brasilmas As a creator that focused on accuracy and script detail, it takes crazy time with little feedback/reward. I also highly dislike the “jackhammer” and started to script the quality I wanted to see. I am not even mentioning AI script generators. Nuance is time consuming and users might not actually see the details in the heatmaps generated from the site. For example: I decided to show some different script points in my recent paid script which is similar to Slibowitz’s suggestion to have a gif showing the script. However, even with both the gif created for that script and with site heatmap, there is lack detail found in a carefully crafted script. The only way to really filter out the low-effort scripts would be an feedback system.
As for incentivizing feedback… this isn’t going to be popular:
- limited free downloads for lukers
- posting a set number of interactions with the site (comments, likes, links, ect) increases weekly download amount
- completing the official Eroscripts feedback for a script gives unlimited script downloads for that week
- creating a topic and posting a script to Eroscripts allows unlimited downloads for the week/month
Obviously these would vary depending on site leadership and whats the main interaction goal.