It’s abhorrent to me that “you people” care about the technicality of a title, and not what the content actually is. Just because a child wasn’t harmed in the making of animated pedophilia, doesn’t mean children aren’t harmed because of it’s existence. The question shouldn’t be “can you get away with it”, but “should you be a decent human being”.
It’s like a meme in Japanese where they don’t say things like JK (女子高生 or high school student) out loud and they censor it, almost as if to spit in the face at Japanese censorship itself, even when it’s written in plain Japanese what the word is. It’s indeed 12歳 so age 12.
Honestly, this 3D hentai is like less cursed than some of the actual loli stuff that’s been posted here, imo, but I guess because it’s imitating real-life JAV stuff it’s no bueno.
Which is a shame, because I was looking forward to doing what I do and posting the 1080p HQ version of this once shbek posts the script
we’ve debated this a lot in another topic and internally. If I recall, when it comes to fiction, it’s impossibly difficult to make any specific rules because you can always conjure up a fictional edge case that challenges the rules.
the current rule is that generally stuff is okay if it’s obviously not real, but mods reserve the right to remove things at our own discretion
You’ve got it precisely backwards. Providing an outlet for people who involuntarily feel an attraction to young children increases safety.
If no child was involved in the production, it is not, by definition, child pornography, and no children were hurt. I’m aware that some backwards legal jurisdictions in the world have laws on the books that contradict this fact, but that’s an issue for residents of those nations.
If you, like me, don’t care for such content, just skip it. Like you do for everything else you’re not interested in.